OR Foundation
  • About
    • Oral Reconstruction Foundation
      • Purpose and Mission
      • Foundation Board
      • Scientific Working Group
      • Education Working Group
      • History
      • Career
      • News
  • Granting
    • Requirements
    • Application
  • Publications
    • Grant Publications
    • Consensus Publications
  • Awards
    • Research Award
      • Awards 2018/2019
      • Award 2016/2017
      • Award 2014/2015
      • Award 2012/2013
      • Award 2010/2011
      • Award 2008/2009
    • Poster Competition
      • Competition 2018
      • Competition 2016
      • Competition 2014
      • Competition 2012
  • Education
    • International Symposia
    • Global Symposia
    • National Symposia
    • Curriculum
    • Education Courses
    • Webinars
  • Contact
Select Page

A Comparison Between Fixed and Removable Mandibular Implant-Supported Full-Arch Prostheses: An Overview of Systematic Reviews


Tsigarida A, Chochlidakis K.

Int J Prosthodont. 2021 Suppl;34:s85-s92

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate the current literature and provide clinical recommendations related to the number of implants, implant characteristics, loading protocols, survival rates, biologic and mechanical complications, patient satisfaction, and financial considerations for mandibular implant-supported full-arch prostheses..

Material and methods:

A PubMed/MEDLINE search for literature published between January 1, 1980 and February 8, 2019, was performed for systematic reviews on this topic. The PICO question was: In mandibular fully edentulous patients treated with implant full-arch prostheses, is there any difference between fixed and removable implant prostheses in terms of implant and prosthesis survival rates? Only systematic reviews with or without meta-analyses were included. The findings varied based on the type of implant full-arch prosthesis.

Results:

High survival rates for implants and prostheses have been reported for fixed and removable implant full-arch prostheses in the mandible. Immediate loading procedures present with high survival rates for both fixed and removable prostheses. There are differences in the number of implants, implant characteristics, complications, and financial implications between these two types of prostheses, which clinicians need to account for as part of the treatment planning process.

Conclusion:

Implant-supported overdentures and implant-supported fixed complete dentures represent clinically successful treatment approaches. In cases where both treatment options are indicated, patient expectations and cost should be the determining factors for selecting a treatment modality.

SOURCE

Latest Research Award Winners

Dr. Yifan Zhang
Quantitative Clinical Adjustment Analysis of Posterior Single Implant Crown in a Chairside Digital Workflow: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2019;30:1059-1066

Read more

Dr. Hyun-Chang Lim
Tissue integration of zirconia and titanium implants with and without buccal dehiscence defects — A histologic and radiographic preclinical study. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2019;30:660-9

Read more

Dr. Lorenzo Tavelli
Acellular dermal matrix and coronally advanced flap or tunnel technique in the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions. A 12-year follow-up from a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46:937-48

Read more

Dr. Lukasz Witek
Repair of critical-sized long bone defects using dipyridamole-augmented 3D-printed bioactive ceramic scaffolds. J Orthop Res. 2019;37:2499-507

Read more

Oral Reconstruction Foundation


Margarethenstrasse 38 

4053 Basel
Switzerland

Phone: +41 61 565 41 51
Email: info@orfoundation.org

OR Foundation – U.S. Section

2300 Riverchase Center
Birmingham, AL 35244
USA
Phone: +1 205 986 7989
Email: info.us@orfoundation.org

Newsletter

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS

© Oral Reconstruction Foundation 2023 | Imprint | Disclaimer | Privacy | Sitemap | Professional websites Basel