OR Foundation
  • About
    • Oral Reconstruction Foundation
      • Purpose and Mission
      • Foundation Board
      • Scientific Working Group
      • Education Working Group
      • History
      • Career
      • News
  • Granting
    • Requirements
    • Application
  • Publications
    • Grant Publications
    • Consensus Publications
  • Awards
    • Research Award
      • Awards 2018/2019
      • Award 2016/2017
      • Award 2014/2015
      • Award 2012/2013
      • Award 2010/2011
      • Award 2008/2009
    • Poster Competition
      • Competition 2018
      • Competition 2016
      • Competition 2014
      • Competition 2012
  • Education
    • International Symposia
    • Global Symposia
    • National Symposia
    • Curriculum
    • Education Courses
    • Webinars
  • Contact
Select Page

Adhesion of living cells to abutment materials, dentin, and adhesive luting cement with different surface qualities.


Mehl C, Kern M, SchĂĽtte AM, Kadem LF, Selhuber-Unkel C

Dent Mater 2016;32(12):1524-35 (Grant CF21405)

Abstract

Objective:

We tested the adhesion properties of living gingival fibroblasts on three different implant abutment materials, adhesive resin used to bond bi-partite abutments, and human dentin.

Methods:

Discs of lithium disilicate (LS), zirconium dioxide (Zr), adhesive resin cement (AR), titanium (Ti), and human dentin (HD) were fabricated with three different levels of surface roughness (rough, machined, and polished). Ra and Rz, water contact angle, and cell detachment forces were measured. Cell detachment force was measured for single cells using single-cell force spectroscopy. Data were statistically analyzed using parametric tests (ANOVA, MANOVA, Bonferroni post-hoc tests).

Results:

Surface roughness significantly influenced the water contact angle for all materials (P≤0.05). Overall, HD showed the lowest contact angle, followed by LS, Ti, Zr, and AR (P≤0.05). Comparison of cell detachment forces between materials with rough and machined surfaces revealed no significant differences (P>0.05), with the exception of Zr compared to HD with rough surfaces (P=0.006). For polished surfaces, HD showed the highest detachment force (P≤0.0001), followed by Ti, AR, and Zr, which did not significantly differ from each other (P>0.05) and LS; Ti/AR was significantly different from LS (P≤0.05). Except for HD, where polished surfaces exhibited the highest cell detachment force (P≤0.002), most machined surfaces showed higher cell detachment forces than polished or rough surfaces.

Significance:

Implant abutments should ideally be provided with a machined like surface roughness for best cell adhesion.

SOURCE

Latest Research Award Winners

Dr. Yifan Zhang
Quantitative Clinical Adjustment Analysis of Posterior Single Implant Crown in a Chairside Digital Workflow: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2019;30:1059-1066

Read more

Dr. Hyun-Chang Lim
Tissue integration of zirconia and titanium implants with and without buccal dehiscence defects — A histologic and radiographic preclinical study. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2019;30:660-9

Read more

Dr. Lorenzo Tavelli
Acellular dermal matrix and coronally advanced flap or tunnel technique in the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions. A 12-year follow-up from a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46:937-48

Read more

Dr. Lukasz Witek
Repair of critical-sized long bone defects using dipyridamole-augmented 3D-printed bioactive ceramic scaffolds. J Orthop Res. 2019;37:2499-507

Read more

Oral Reconstruction Foundation


Margarethenstrasse 38 

4053 Basel
Switzerland

Phone: +41 61 565 41 51
Email: info@orfoundation.org

OR Foundation – U.S. Section

2300 Riverchase Center
Birmingham, AL 35244
USA
Phone: +1 205 986 7989
Email: info.us@orfoundation.org

Newsletter

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS

© Oral Reconstruction Foundation 2023 | Imprint | Disclaimer | Privacy | Sitemap | Professional websites Basel